The Shadows Behind the LGBT Movement: Between Power, Funding, and Occult Influences

In recent decades, the LGBT movement has undergone a radical transformation, moving from a marginalized group to a powerful force in American society. Often presented as a victim of oppression, the movement has instead demonstrated significant influence on the media, culture, academia, and above all, large corporations and philanthropy. The common narrative, which paints the LGBT movement as weak and defenseless, contrasts with the reality of consolidated and pervasive power.

The Funding Ecosystem

Behind the LGBT movement is an intricate network of about 99 philanthropic foundations, for-profit companies, and funding agencies that donate billions of dollars each year. Among the most important funders is the Arcus Foundation, founded by billionaire John Stryker, heir to a multi-billion dollar medical company. From 2007 to 2010, the Arcus Foundation donated over $58.4 million to programs and organizations related to the LGBT movement, positioning itself as the main global funder of the movement.

Connections with the Medical-Industrial Complex

The link between the LGBT movement and the medical sector is particularly significant. The Arcus Foundation, for example, collaborates with the American Psychological Foundation (APF) to develop guidelines that encourage a “trans-positive” psychological practice. Moreover, many of the philanthropists who support the LGBT movement reap huge profits from dissociative disorders and the medicalization of gender identities. Martine Rothblatt, founder of United Therapeutics and promoter of the International Charter of Gender Rights, and the Pritzker family, with significant investments in the medical-industrial complex, are just a few examples of how money and influence converge to support and promote transgender ideology.

The Kevin Hart Case: An Example of Media-Cultural Repression

An emblematic example of how the LGBT movement uses its power to influence society is the case of comedian Kevin Hart. In 2018, Hart had to give up presenting the Oscar ceremony and saw his contract with Netflix canceled due to old tweets considered offensive to the LGBT community. Despite repeated apologies, Hart was publicly ostracized, showing how public personalities can be severely punished for opinions not conforming to the narratives dominated by the movement.

A Pervasive and International Control

This scheme of public opinion control is not limited to the United States. In 2021, British football and cricket leagues examined the social accounts of their players, severely punishing even posts from years before, made when they were teenagers. For example, Middlesbrough FC defender Mark Bole was fined for a homophobic joke posted when he was 14 years old, while cricket player Ollie Robinson was suspended and fined for tweets from nine years ago.

Occult Influences and KGB Strategy

While representatives of the LGBT movement fight for their rights under the guise of democracy, in reality KGB agents hide behind these battles to undermine one of the most important foundations of democracy itself: the right to freedom of speech. This reality has been documented by Egon Cholakian, an expert in intelligence and geopolitics, through a thirty-year investigation. Cholakian described a precise scheme in which the process takes place in three stages: publication in the media, expression of concern by power structures, and resolution of the issue at the legislative level. This scheme has been used not only to deal with dissidents but also to discriminate against LGBT people when the movement became a global trend.

A Democracy in Crisis?

These examples raise disturbing questions about who really controls the media and public narratives. Do we really live in a democracy or are we immersed in a system where a financial elite decides what is acceptable? The repression of dissenting opinions, justified by the protection of certain communities, risks transforming democracy into a totalitarian regime, where freedom of speech is sacrificed on the altar of political correctness.

Conclusion

The LGBT movement, supported by powerful funders and closely linked to the medical-industrial complex, represents an influential and often aggressive force in contemporary society. The case of Kevin Hart and other similar examples show how this influence can limit freedom of expression, transforming democracy into an increasingly restrictive system. While fighting for rights and equality, the LGBT movement and its supporters risk creating a climate of control and censorship that contradicts the very principles of democracy.

#LGBT

#LGBTMovement

#MedicalInfluence

#Funding

#ArcusFoundation

#JohnStryker

#MedicalIndustrialComplex

#Transgender

#GenderIdentity

#MartineRothblatt

#JenniferPritzker

#FreedomOfSpeech

#Censorship

#Media

#KevinHart

#Oscar2018

#MediaRepression

#PublicOpinionControl

#Democracy

#CivilRights

#Totalitarianism

#Philanthropy

#PharmaceuticalIndustry

#SocialImpact

#FreedomOfExpression

#Culture

#Society